Posts Tagged ‘map’

Lean Six Sigma Improvement and Work Design, Part 5

Monday, July 12th, 2010

This is the fifth post in a series taken from a lesson in Pyzdek Institute Lean Six Sigma Black Belt training. Future posts will continue the topic. You can find all of the articles in the series by searching this site for the title.

Which non-value added activities can be eliminated immediately?

Of course, the standard work description, including the work element times, is just a starting point. Constant improvement is expected in the way the work is done and the time it takes to do it. For the long term, consider creating an opportunity map for the work within the cell and pursuing the opportunities over time. It’s a good idea to do this even before the original work cell design is complete. You can use the work element time data you just collected for this purpose. Create a stacked bar chart showing all of the work element in the work cell. One of the bars is for the work elements used currently, the other will show only the work elements that are actually included in the work cell design. In particular, you need to focus on eliminating non-value added work. You may recall from the lesson on opportunity maps that work is considered value added only if all of the following are true:

  1. It is done right the first time. Rework does not count as value-added work.
  2. The customer is willing to pay for it.
  3. It changes the thing being worked on. Moves, inspection, or storage are not value-added.

Figure 6 shows a stacked bar chart of the initial improvements that can be made to the weld + inspect process when changing the design from batch-and-queue to a continuous flow cell. The team focused on non-value work elements, mainly waiting and moving, and made the improvements shown.

Figure 6-Paper Kaizen




Paper Kaizen

Figure 6-Paper Kaizen




How should the workplace be arranged?

Cell design is performed in two phases.

  • Phase 1: Document the current state. This topic has been covered in several earlier modules. At this point in your Lean Six Sigma project you have already created a lean value stream at the process level. Cell design begins from there.
  • Phase 2: Convert to a process-based layout. Cause-and-effect diagrams are a useful tool here.
    When creating a cause-and-effect diagram you were taught that they can be used to identify the causes of a problem you are trying to solve. Here the problem is one of achieving continuous flow. When creating a cause-and-effect diagram use the “4 Ms” as a starting point: Men (and women,) Methods, Machines, and Materials. How should these elements be combined to achieve maximum flow?

How should we layout the equipment so movement of people and materials is efficient?

Continuous flow work cells are nearly always shaped like either “U” or “C” to minimize walking. The equipment and workstations are arranged close together in the sequence of the work steps. This arrangement reduces walking distance to a minimum and results in the worker being near the start point of the next work cycle when he completes the work cycle. It is different than many traditional operation based work layouts where a worker sits or stands in one position and does a very simple repetitive task all day. The traditional work arrangement leads to psychological issues such as boredom or mental fatigue, as well as physical problems from repetitive stress injuries.

Where will WIP be stored?

Standard stock refers to the materials that are needed to begin work within a process, such as work-in-process inventory (WIP.) The design of the work cell will influence the WIP requirements; conversely, WIP requirements will influence the design of the work cell. Ideally, one piece will start at the beginning of the work cell and progress through each process step without the need to stop. However, there are circumstances that may require additional stock. For example, if part is welded at one step and needs to cool before it can be processed through the next step. Or if there is a need to perform an inspection before the part is placed in a subassembly where it can’t be accessed afterwards. Bottlenecks, by definition, can’t produce enough to meet takt time requirements. The bottleneck problem is sometimes solved by additional WIP to supplement the bottleneck’s output.

How can we rearrange the workplace quickly when we need to make a different item?

As discussed earlier, the equipment used for Lean production tends to be smaller and more mobile. It is usually possible to rearrange the equipment in a work cell quickly so different parts can be made using the same equipment. Work cell design should make this as simple to do as possible. Also consider where equipment, fixtures, WIP and other items will be placed when not needed for the item currently being produced. Storage areas should be nearby and clearly marked so workers know where to store unneeded resources, and where to find them when they are needed again. It should be easy to physically move the equipment and, if necessary, reconnect to power, plumbing, etc..

GD Star Rating
loading...

Six Sigma Project Guidelines in Plain English

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Define the project

In this phase you will select a good project and describe it in detail. A good project is one that will have an impact on something important to the organization, requires the Six Sigma skill set, and has a good chance of succeeding. To determine this you need to link your project to the goals of your leadership; make sure the project isn’t too large to be manageable or too small to be meaningful; is authorized by an appropriate sponsor; and is well planned. You will form a team to work with you. (From this point on whenever the word “you” is used, it refers to your team.) To describe your project you will draw a picture of the process your project will address, identify the customers for your project and determine what they want from the project, and qualitatively determine what will drive the project’s results.
Validate the measurement system and get the baseline

In this phase you will make sure that you can measure the process and the project outcomes. You will operationally define the drivers by identifying how to measure them and you will gather data to determine the process baseline. The baseline is how the key project outcome metrics and drivers have performed in the past and are performing now. You will link the driver data to the outcomes to help you determine which drivers are likely to be the most important (this is called stratifying the data.) You will look at how well other organizations do on your project outcome measures and you will use this information to set goals for the outcomes.

Identify key levers (Xs) that drive outcomes

You will sharpen your focus by drawing a detailed picture of the process. Using the map and the information from the previous phase you will think about what causes the outcomes and the drivers to vary. You will convert your ideas into hypotheses that can be tested scientifically. You will collect data and analyze the data to test your hypotheses and to create mathematical models of cause and effect. You will use the models to determine which drivers need to change to achieve your goals for the outcomes. You will analyze the cost of changing the drivers.

Determine improvement strategy

Using the cost analysis and performance the models you will set goals for the drivers. You will come up with creative ways to achieve these goals and create plans for implementing these changes. You will look at how the plans could fail and take action to reduce the risk of failure. You will try your plan on a small scale to test your plan. For the risks that can’t be eliminated, you will develop contingency plans.

Make permanent improvements

You will create standard operating procedures for the new process and you will work with the process owner to implement the changes. You will create a set of measurements that the new owner will use to monitor the new process. You will hand the process over to the owner. Periodically you will check back with the owner to provide assistance and to confirm that the project’s goals continue to be met.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Get Certified!

Be trained by Thomas Pyzdek

Black Belt

Green Belt

Learn More!

Resources for Six Sigma


Introduction to Six Sigma
Six Sigma Projects
Six Sigma Tools
Six Sigma Statistics
Six Sigma Videos (Requires QuickTime)
Leading Six Sigma
Healthcare Quality
Process Excellence Podcasts
Other Useful Links
Good books on Six Sigma and other topics

What is Six Sigma?

By Thomas Pyzdek, Author of The Six Sigma Handbook

For Motorola, the originator of Six Sigma, the answer to the question "Why Six Sigma?" was simple: survival. Motorola came to Six Sigma because it was being consistently beaten in the competitive marketplace by foreign firms that were able to produce higher quality products at a lower cost. When a Japanese firm took over a Motorola factory that manufactured Quasar television sets in the United States in the 1970s, they promptly set about making drastic changes in the way the factory operated. Under Japanese management, the factory was soon producing TV sets with 1/20th the number of defects they had produced under Motorola management. They did this using the same workforce, technology, and designs, making it clear that the problem was Motorola's management. Eventually, even Motorola's own executives had to admit "our quality stinks." Read More...