Posts Tagged ‘lean’

Six Sigma Project Presentations in a Nutshell

Saturday, August 14th, 2010

I’ve reviewed thousands of improvement projects. I’ve lost count of how many project presentations I’ve attended, either for certification purposes or for presentations to leaders. I’ve come to the conclusion that most Green Belts and Black Belts simultaneously present too much information, and not enough information. If I may speak to Green Belts and Black Belts on behalf of leaders and Master Black Belts everywhere, here’s what I’d like to say. What we’re asking is actually very simple, namely how did you apply the Six Sigma process to pursue a real opportunity? In other words, for your project just walk us through the L1 Six Sigma process shown in the figure, and do so in 45 minutes or less. I actually don’t even care if you use a PowerPoint template, or even if you have any slides whatever. I just want to hear a great Six Sigma success story.

Six Sigma L1 Map

GD Star Rating
loading...

Lean Six Sigma Improvement and Work Design, Part 5

Monday, July 12th, 2010

This is the fifth post in a series taken from a lesson in Pyzdek Institute Lean Six Sigma Black Belt training. Future posts will continue the topic. You can find all of the articles in the series by searching this site for the title.

Which non-value added activities can be eliminated immediately?

Of course, the standard work description, including the work element times, is just a starting point. Constant improvement is expected in the way the work is done and the time it takes to do it. For the long term, consider creating an opportunity map for the work within the cell and pursuing the opportunities over time. It’s a good idea to do this even before the original work cell design is complete. You can use the work element time data you just collected for this purpose. Create a stacked bar chart showing all of the work element in the work cell. One of the bars is for the work elements used currently, the other will show only the work elements that are actually included in the work cell design. In particular, you need to focus on eliminating non-value added work. You may recall from the lesson on opportunity maps that work is considered value added only if all of the following are true:

  1. It is done right the first time. Rework does not count as value-added work.
  2. The customer is willing to pay for it.
  3. It changes the thing being worked on. Moves, inspection, or storage are not value-added.

Figure 6 shows a stacked bar chart of the initial improvements that can be made to the weld + inspect process when changing the design from batch-and-queue to a continuous flow cell. The team focused on non-value work elements, mainly waiting and moving, and made the improvements shown.

Figure 6-Paper Kaizen




Paper Kaizen

Figure 6-Paper Kaizen




How should the workplace be arranged?

Cell design is performed in two phases.

  • Phase 1: Document the current state. This topic has been covered in several earlier modules. At this point in your Lean Six Sigma project you have already created a lean value stream at the process level. Cell design begins from there.
  • Phase 2: Convert to a process-based layout. Cause-and-effect diagrams are a useful tool here.
    When creating a cause-and-effect diagram you were taught that they can be used to identify the causes of a problem you are trying to solve. Here the problem is one of achieving continuous flow. When creating a cause-and-effect diagram use the “4 Ms” as a starting point: Men (and women,) Methods, Machines, and Materials. How should these elements be combined to achieve maximum flow?

How should we layout the equipment so movement of people and materials is efficient?

Continuous flow work cells are nearly always shaped like either “U” or “C” to minimize walking. The equipment and workstations are arranged close together in the sequence of the work steps. This arrangement reduces walking distance to a minimum and results in the worker being near the start point of the next work cycle when he completes the work cycle. It is different than many traditional operation based work layouts where a worker sits or stands in one position and does a very simple repetitive task all day. The traditional work arrangement leads to psychological issues such as boredom or mental fatigue, as well as physical problems from repetitive stress injuries.

Where will WIP be stored?

Standard stock refers to the materials that are needed to begin work within a process, such as work-in-process inventory (WIP.) The design of the work cell will influence the WIP requirements; conversely, WIP requirements will influence the design of the work cell. Ideally, one piece will start at the beginning of the work cell and progress through each process step without the need to stop. However, there are circumstances that may require additional stock. For example, if part is welded at one step and needs to cool before it can be processed through the next step. Or if there is a need to perform an inspection before the part is placed in a subassembly where it can’t be accessed afterwards. Bottlenecks, by definition, can’t produce enough to meet takt time requirements. The bottleneck problem is sometimes solved by additional WIP to supplement the bottleneck’s output.

How can we rearrange the workplace quickly when we need to make a different item?

As discussed earlier, the equipment used for Lean production tends to be smaller and more mobile. It is usually possible to rearrange the equipment in a work cell quickly so different parts can be made using the same equipment. Work cell design should make this as simple to do as possible. Also consider where equipment, fixtures, WIP and other items will be placed when not needed for the item currently being produced. Storage areas should be nearby and clearly marked so workers know where to store unneeded resources, and where to find them when they are needed again. It should be easy to physically move the equipment and, if necessary, reconnect to power, plumbing, etc..

GD Star Rating
loading...

City Uses Six Sigma to Promote Efficiency

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

Spokesman.com | City adds job to promote efficiency | May 27, 2009.

Spokane, Washington has acted to be smart in its cost-cutting efforts by hiring a full time change agent to look at how Lean Six Sigma can help them make smart cuts. Lean Six Sigma is a methodology that has proven itself in countless applications in manufacturing, services, transaction and healthcare businesses. Spokane’s leaders believe that it can help government too.

Earlier this year the City council decided to offer a no-bid contract to the Indiana-based Lasater Institute for up to $90,000 to train 16 city workers in Six Sigma. The newly approved position will  cost about $120,000 a year in pay and benefits.

“All the successful implementations of Six Sigma, be it federal, municipal or even in the private sector, they all have a central office where the program is administered,” City Administrator Ted Danek said.

The move is not without its critics. “If the city of Spokane wanders into it without keen awareness and careful caution of that fact, it could spell disaster at one of the worst times in our economic history.” Says former City Council candidate Donna McKereghan. However, the council voted 6-0 in support of the new job.

Indeed, Six Sigma has already proven itself in Spokane. Six Sigma has already made the city more efficient, leading the city to streamline its approval process for contracts that don’t require City Council support from an average of 29 days to 10 days. According to Danek.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Health Care Industry Is Said to Commit to Holding Down Costs – NYTimes.com

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

Health Care Industry Is Said to Commit to Holding Down Costs – NYTimes.com.a

No one questions the fact that health care costs are rising fast. Too fast, probably. Now that the industry has promised to join President Obama in controlling health care costs, I have a suggestion: do it smart. Mindless cutting of health care costs will result in loss of health care quality. Don’t just cut costs, be sure that you are cutting non-value added costs. The best tools for identifying these costs are Lean, Six Sigma, and Lean Six Sigma. To a trained expert in one of these skill sets a casual glance at any hospital reveals mind-boggling opportunities. We see waste everywhere in health care. From the batch-and-queue approach in the emergency departments, to the cumbersome admissions and discharge processes, in the medication errors and medical mistakes. And many, many other areas.

According to Mr. Obama

“These groups are voluntarily coming together to make an unprecedented commitment. Over the next 10 years, from 2010 to 2019, they are pledging to cut the growth rate of national health care spending by 1.5 percentage points each year — an amount that’s equal to over $2 trillion.”

The goal is admirable, albeit arbitrary. Nonetheless, it is a call to action that is long overdue. Let’s all hope, for the sake of our health and the health of our loved ones, that the spending cuts are the right ones.

GD Star Rating
loading...

A Lean Green Six Sigma Machine

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

A Lean Green Six Sigma Machine – Manufacturing & Technology eJournal.

It’s Earth Day, so here’s my obligatory green article.

OK, I admit it, I’m not a Greenie. Don’t get me wrong, I love the natural world. I was born and raised in Nebraska and from the time I was a little boy I spent every moment I could hiking, hunting, fishing, and just enjoying the outdoors. I now enjoy Arizona’s forests and deserts at every opportunity. But I’m also committed to facts, data and real science and I’ve become convinced that modern Greenies are more Earth Worshipers than conservationists. I want to see nature preserved for my grandson, and I fear that it has become a fad that will swing too far in the opposite direction some day.  Still, this article caught my eye. The basic premise is that Lean Six Sigma can help a company become more green.

Of course it can. Lean Six Sigma can take you toward nearly any goal you want faster. Think of Lean Six Sigma as a formula one race car for driving to your goals. If your goal is to become more green, then Lean Six Sigma will make you greener faster. It does this by helping you clarify your green goals, providing a framework for achieving these goals, evaluating the measurement system and identifying critical to quality drivers, building valid models linking causes to your goals, identifying the best improved system, deploying the system, and controlling the new system to assure consistent operation.

If you want to become greener, make your customers happier, or make more money for your investors, then Lean Six Sigma is the way to go.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Tough Times and Lean Six Sigma

Monday, April 6th, 2009

Tom provides a little background on the current economic crisis, and some pointers to help you survive and prosper.

December 14th, 2008

January 4th, 2009

GD Star Rating
loading...

President Obama, Rush Limbaugh, and me

Monday, March 30th, 2009

Did Rush Limbaugh really say that he wants Obama to fail? Does it matter? What’s my opinion? (Okay, so nobody asked. But it’s my blog after all!)

Personally, I sincerely hope the world returns to prosperity soon. I think there is overwhelming agreement on the fact that there are few downsides to prosperity. But the great debate is how to achieve prosperity. I won’t argue the relative merits of the different economic systems because I doubt that you care. However, I have a rather strong opinion that spending more money will not, by itself, lead to improvements. Deming used to say (I’m paraphrasing here) that doubling the pay of every worker in the auto industry wouldn’t make any difference in the quality or productivity of the auto companies. Why? Because the systems were the same. Unless systems (root causes) are changed, the results (effects) won’t change. When I look at the plans proposed by the government they largely consist of spending more on, for example, roads and schools without changing the way roads are built or education is delivered. Medical records are to be digitized, while the healthcare systems being automated are not substantially improved beforehand.

In short, I think a good deal of the money being spent will fail to provide any fundamentally different results because the underlying systems won’t be improved by the spending. A penny spent on six sigma, lean, or quality improvement would go a lot further than a dollar spent on the current systems.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Fake Flow

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

There seems to be an epidemic in American Management of copying the form of things, without bringing the substance along. I was reminded of this when touring a factory with a team evaluating a potential new supplier. The company had put much of their equipment on wheeled dollies. Such things as jigs, drill presses, etc. were mounted in this way. I’d seen a lot of this during my visits to factories overseas. The objective was to make the factory easy to reconfigure. When orders were received for a new product family the factory could be quickly changed and production would hardly miss a beat. The problem was, the American company didn’t do this. The equipment was movable alright, but it didn’t move. Production was pure batch-and-queue with all of the inventory, quality problems, and waste that this approach entails.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Get Certified!

Be trained by Thomas Pyzdek

Black Belt

Green Belt

Learn More!

Resources for Six Sigma


Introduction to Six Sigma
Six Sigma Projects
Six Sigma Tools
Six Sigma Statistics
Six Sigma Videos (Requires QuickTime)
Leading Six Sigma
Healthcare Quality
Process Excellence Podcasts
Other Useful Links
Good books on Six Sigma and other topics

What is Six Sigma?

By Thomas Pyzdek, Author of The Six Sigma Handbook

For Motorola, the originator of Six Sigma, the answer to the question "Why Six Sigma?" was simple: survival. Motorola came to Six Sigma because it was being consistently beaten in the competitive marketplace by foreign firms that were able to produce higher quality products at a lower cost. When a Japanese firm took over a Motorola factory that manufactured Quasar television sets in the United States in the 1970s, they promptly set about making drastic changes in the way the factory operated. Under Japanese management, the factory was soon producing TV sets with 1/20th the number of defects they had produced under Motorola management. They did this using the same workforce, technology, and designs, making it clear that the problem was Motorola's management. Eventually, even Motorola's own executives had to admit "our quality stinks." Read More...