Posts Tagged ‘ford’

Ford Quality

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

I was at Douglas Aircraft in the early 80’s when sevral Ford executives, including Larry Sullivan came out to understand how the aerospace industry managed quality. We had a lengthy discussion regarding supplier quality. Ford was just starting to train their suppliers and since they were facing significant economic challeges the suppliers had to pay to attend these sessions. The mesage was very direct. The suppliers had to take responsibility for the quality of the product. This was all happening during the launch of the Taurus/ sable, one of the most successful cars ever introduced.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Study: Ford Quality Rivaling Japanese Counterparts – Industry Headlines – Quality

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

Study: Ford Quality Rivaling Japanese Counterparts – Industry Headlines – Quality.

Ford Motor Co. surpassed Honda in initial vehicle quality for the first time and reached new levels of customer satisfaction with vehicle quality, according to a 2009 U.S. Global Quality Research System (GQRS) survey conducted for Ford by RDA Group of Bloomfield Hills, MI. Ford also is statistically tied with Toyota at the top of the industry when it comes to initial vehicle quality, according the survey.

This is great news. It gives all of us hope that American industry can turn things around. Of course, there’s more to winning in the business world than quality, but quality is an excellent place to start. In fact, it’s your ticket to the game. If you can’t get quality right, then you can’t play. Your customers will look elsewhere.

In the early 1980s Ford turned their business around. They began by loosing more money than any company had ever lost, and within five years they made more profit than any company had ever made. The transition was remarkable, and I had a ringside seat. I was able to work with Ford’s suppliers in a consultant and trainer role. I was also able to visit Ford for Dr. W. Edwards Deming’s seminars. Those meetings featured panels of Ford executives and Dr. Deming discussing their transformation activities. Without a doubt it was the best training a young consultant could get. I learned that when the top people take over a transformation with a sense of urgency that most of the barriers evaporate. All of us consultants were challenged to explain our approach to an audience that was intensely interested. We shared our success and failure stories with Ford’s leadership, and they shared theirs with us. It was a serious business, and it was an exciting time.

It looks as if Ford is having exciting times once again. Hopefully this time it will stick and they’ll have permanent prosperity. I think that the fact that Ford has refused the government’s offer of “help” is a significant factor. It was a risky thing to do, but by doing so Ford was faced with an urgency similar to that which existed when they made their last transformation. I believe the sense of urgency is a vital ingredient in success.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Get Certified!

Be trained by Thomas Pyzdek

Black Belt

Green Belt

Learn More!

Resources for Six Sigma


Introduction to Six Sigma
Six Sigma Projects
Six Sigma Tools
Six Sigma Statistics
Six Sigma Videos (Requires QuickTime)
Leading Six Sigma
Healthcare Quality
Process Excellence Podcasts
Other Useful Links
Good books on Six Sigma and other topics

What is Six Sigma?

By Thomas Pyzdek, Author of The Six Sigma Handbook

For Motorola, the originator of Six Sigma, the answer to the question "Why Six Sigma?" was simple: survival. Motorola came to Six Sigma because it was being consistently beaten in the competitive marketplace by foreign firms that were able to produce higher quality products at a lower cost. When a Japanese firm took over a Motorola factory that manufactured Quasar television sets in the United States in the 1970s, they promptly set about making drastic changes in the way the factory operated. Under Japanese management, the factory was soon producing TV sets with 1/20th the number of defects they had produced under Motorola management. They did this using the same workforce, technology, and designs, making it clear that the problem was Motorola's management. Eventually, even Motorola's own executives had to admit "our quality stinks." Read More...